|
|
Post by Mr David on Oct 18, 2011 20:11:04 GMT
the only review that matters
Sylvain Chuzeville
Beady Eye's Different Gear Still Speeding > Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds
Unlike · · Share · 5 hours ago ·
|
|
|
|
Post by Columbia_rocks_man on Oct 18, 2011 21:03:17 GMT
Liam's snide yowl will always win out over Noel's passable but pedestrian voice.
Another massive win for Team BDI.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2011 21:54:17 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by longjohn on Oct 19, 2011 5:11:40 GMT
Great record bar If i had a gun. That one is skip all the time.
|
|
|
|
Post by justaddbeer on Oct 19, 2011 9:50:37 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by monkeytennis on Oct 19, 2011 9:55:00 GMT
that pitchfork review is pretty spot on as well
|
|
|
|
Post by 8track on Oct 19, 2011 10:11:25 GMT
5.7 is pretty much exactly what i would rate the record if rating things to one decimal place wasn't RIDICULOUS and WRONG tbh. so 3/5 it is.
|
|
|
|
Post by eddiemurphy on Oct 19, 2011 10:34:26 GMT
5.7.  7 is about right. falls a bit short. but some corkers. agree it doesn't really go anywhere we haven't been before on the sound. but that's for twats like them to worry about. it's about the songs. and it's better than different gear still wanking. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by monkeytennis on Oct 19, 2011 10:50:43 GMT
1 decimal place is the proper way ;D mahoney has already pretty much agreed, now regularly rating things with .25/.50/.75's, everyone else will fall into line fairly soon  |
|
|
|
Post by 8track on Oct 19, 2011 11:10:50 GMT
2 decimal places? that really does take the piss. i reckon this album is 0.01 better than that album because that C-Am chord change on track 5 is a bit predictable? not having that  tbh reviews without any score >>>>> reviews with a score but obviously that rarely happens so i'm now a firm believer that a combination of a couple of paragraphs and a rating out of 5* is an ideal way to rate anything  *or out of 10 on occasion if you're feeling a bit poncy |
|
|
|
Post by secondcoming on Oct 19, 2011 11:12:39 GMT
;D
|
|
|
|
Post by secondcoming on Oct 19, 2011 11:14:05 GMT
Oh and pitchfork is the cancer of all things music related. Edit: Didn't see ton posted it so it wasn't very serious Still, what I said stands ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2011 12:09:11 GMT
1 decimal place is the proper way ;D mahoney has already pretty much agreed, now regularly rating things with .25/.50/.75's, everyone else will fall into line fairly soon I only need 40 variables not 100 you big gay fag! my way is the only way. how dare you try to associate me with your silly scoring system. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2011 14:31:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by mouth(man!!) on Oct 19, 2011 15:01:56 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by monkeytennis on Oct 19, 2011 15:04:51 GMT
or don't because it only paints you in the worst possible light and is desperately sad?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr David on Oct 19, 2011 15:06:26 GMT
why is giving an average album an average review stupid? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2011 15:07:52 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by monkeytennis on Oct 19, 2011 15:09:11 GMT
how can you criticise an entire review cos he got one 3 letter word wrong? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2011 15:16:21 GMT
how can you criticise an entire review cos he got one 3 letter word wrong? I dont critise the review, you sad fucker I'm after the dude himself. he can't write something about he's got wrong anyway ;D Hot Time!! it's High tide ffs he's complaining about 2 words he hasnt got right anyway and you silly rat says he's spot on? you may be worst than him tbf |
|
