|
|
Post by leanne on Apr 20, 2012 16:42:41 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2012 17:36:13 GMT
love that tune. Gem is mega. but Andy Bell....  boring as fuck. just like mayoney, mrsw david and columbia rocks man's gig reviews. fucking twats |
|
|
|
Post by barny on Apr 20, 2012 18:35:50 GMT
Why are you pretending to be Chuz? Said snake, not dove |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2012 19:55:13 GMT
Why are you pretending to be Chuz? that guy really had an impact on you, ah ya fucking queer? you're afraid. you stick to that fucking computer and be sad |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2012 20:07:35 GMT
this was a day or two after tony had been flippant about noel's childhood boo hoo story to guigs. Noel and Liam were abused by their dad. If Guigsy stuck up for Noel for this reason then Guigsy is an even bigger legend. |
|
|
|
Post by danscouse on Apr 20, 2012 20:41:24 GMT
this was a day or two after tony had been flippant about noel's childhood boo hoo story to guigs. Noel and Liam were abused by their dad. If Guigsy stuck up for Noel for this reason then Guigsy is an even bigger legend. I think Noels admitted a few times now that their dad didnt abuse them....they just played on that as it helped their image. Even as far as Paul gallaghers book if you read between the lines of hyperbole, he wasn't all that bad (for instance all 3 kept working for him after they'd left to the new house with the mum etc) I Genuinly think Noel's a bit embarrassed by the whole thing now (certainly that's the impression he gave on parky and that bbc interview the other week) |
|
|
|
Post by eddiemurphy on Apr 20, 2012 21:29:30 GMT
this was a day or two after tony had been flippant about noel's childhood boo hoo story to guigs. Noel and Liam were abused by their dad. If Guigsy stuck up for Noel for this reason then Guigsy is an even bigger legend. by telling him his place in the band was all but finished. tony stuck up for guigs a couple of years earlier when his own place in the band was called into question.  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2012 22:35:28 GMT
Noel and Liam were abused by their dad. If Guigsy stuck up for Noel for this reason then Guigsy is an even bigger legend. I think Noels admitted a few times now that their dad didnt abuse them....they just played on that as it helped their image. Even as far as Paul gallaghers book if you read between the lines of hyperbole, he wasn't all that bad (for instance all 3 kept working for him after they'd left to the new house with the mum etc) I Genuinly think Noel's a bit embarrassed by the whole thing now (certainly that's the impression he gave on parky and that bbc interview the other week) Where did he give the indication in the televised interviews that it was untrue? I watched the BBC interview and never saw it. Noel and Paul developed stammers when they were younger due to the unease around their dad, I always presumed this was common knowledge. Anyway, true or untrue, at least due to Tommy Gallagher we got Whatever. I guess he didn't like the strings though...  |
|
|
|
Post by danscouse on Apr 21, 2012 0:31:25 GMT
I think Noels admitted a few times now that their dad didnt abuse them....they just played on that as it helped their image. Even as far as Paul gallaghers book if you read between the lines of hyperbole, he wasn't all that bad (for instance all 3 kept working for him after they'd left to the new house with the mum etc) I Genuinly think Noel's a bit embarrassed by the whole thing now (certainly that's the impression he gave on parky and that bbc interview the other week) Where did he give the indication in the televised interviews that it was untrue? I watched the BBC interview and never saw it. Noel and Paul developed stammers when they were younger due to the unease around their dad, I always presumed this was common knowledge. Anyway, true or untrue, at least due to Tommy Gallagher we got Whatever. I guess he didn't like the strings though... In the 90's it was all this brutal dad stuff, by parky and the Bbc interview it was "the 70's were violent times, my upbringing was the same as every kid in the street, I was no angel" type of stuff. He looks uncomfortable on parky talking about it, which IMO he knows they heaped it on back in the day |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2012 0:50:07 GMT
sully, you know nothing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2012 0:59:02 GMT
You got me!
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2012 1:03:26 GMT
yeah thats right. what the fuck are you on about? being serious and all that and you think you're cool go fuck yourself, you're a mess. like a... fucking... boring mess. you're shit |
|
|
|
Post by lino on Apr 21, 2012 5:32:15 GMT
A decent track, not the worst on the worst Oasis album (LBL).
"I can sleep underwater
Never worry what I'm gonna dream now" ( ermm wut ? )
Up until now, the song's protagonist has felt chained, restrained - as declared in the song's opening line, he's now free - sleeping underwater may seem odd, but our protagonist cares not for anyone else's concerns - FREEDOM! In the past our protagonist has had to be mindful of what they were dreaming - even in sleep, they were persecuted - no more!
"It's hasta manyana [sic]" <---LOL WUT
"Hasta manana" literally translates to "Until tomorrow"; in this context it's a dismissive farewell - our protagonist doesn't actually intend to see the subject of their ire the following day. In fact, judging by the tone of these lyrics, they hope never to see the subject ever again!
"I can sing to the trees
Tarzan on harmonies for free" <---------- LOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Here we have a pop culture reference - the singing to trees is another example of unbridled freedom - who would sing to trees (they cannot hear)? A free man, shackled to no one, and no rules. While on trees, who should appear but Tarzan, infamous for his arboreal obsession (see also the reference to banana-skin feet earlier - fore-shadowing the simian-raised pulp hero's appearance!).
|
|
|
|
Post by leanne on Apr 21, 2012 10:27:19 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by 6twenty on Apr 26, 2012 13:29:03 GMT
its a pretty good song, ive always liked it, it soared more live, but then everything did really that was any cop on HC. because the production is beyond woeful. ive ranted about this at length for a decade, also the selection of tracks from the album sessions to make the final LP is criminally poor.
I enjoy Gem's songs to an extent, and this is far from a bad track.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Great( hehe ) on May 7, 2012 15:37:20 GMT
yep it's awful. the scary part is that, as bad as it is, it's still the best track he has had on an album so far, which only proves that he should have been poisoned after writing the first chord. ;D |
|
