|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2012 20:00:45 GMT
shot up a horde of zombies but I come out top (followed by an apocalyptic keef riff)
^ the above is the stones formula for success post exile
10/10 all neet
don't like it? you're a square FACT
allllllll I hear is doom and gloom, what a fucking CHOON !!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Emilie on Oct 13, 2012 20:05:47 GMT
Pretty cool.
|
|
|
|
Post by 6twenty on Oct 14, 2012 12:46:31 GMT
massive tune.
|
|
|
|
Post by Benoît Assou-Ekotto on Oct 15, 2012 12:13:16 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2012 14:09:02 GMT
I knew it  I'd of gone for 70 quid, they can fuck off. |
|
|
|
Post by Mr David on Oct 15, 2012 14:14:59 GMT
I don't for one second understand why a group of people who could probably spunk away a couple of million quid a year for the rest of their lives without earning another penny would feel the need to do that,
|
|
|
|
Post by barny on Oct 15, 2012 14:27:48 GMT
I supose they are surrounded by hundreds of parasites who need to be fed. And the truth is if they come close enough I will pay it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr David on Oct 15, 2012 14:33:42 GMT
fucks sake don't.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2012 14:35:25 GMT
I see them in '06, my mates bird got us some kind of discount through her work though I think it was only 15%, anyway, it was just under 50 quid which I thought was fair. Seats were far back but it was well worth it. Charlatans supported too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Benoît Assou-Ekotto on Oct 15, 2012 14:57:44 GMT
I'd have probably gone if it was something silly like £130 for a decent ticket but £400 is just mad. I think it's pretty much banged on they're going to doing Glastonbury so people will at least be able to see them for Eavis' ever so slightly less extortionate fees.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimmy on Oct 15, 2012 15:52:58 GMT
I told my lass id buy her ticket aswell. Fuck that. £800 for 2 decent ticket. Im not paying those prices and the £106 ticket will be a shit seat. 31 quid booking fee, it takes the piss. |
|
|
|
Post by srk on Oct 15, 2012 17:58:31 GMT
Can you imagine the hype and excitement if a young band released this? It pisses on everyone and they are pensioners. It's certainly better than anything on that bland piece of shit Bob Dylan released this year. How dare you, sir. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2012 18:30:53 GMT
£400 quid is definitely fair. If a band like beady eye can charge £40 quid a ticket the stones should be doing £1k a seat minimum.
|
|
|
|
Post by stocky on Oct 15, 2012 18:44:56 GMT
Fucks sake, that's absurd. Anyone who pays those prices is a total chump.
|
|
|
|
Post by Columbia_rocks_man on Oct 15, 2012 18:59:59 GMT
Pretty glad I saw them when I did in 1998. I think the ticket was £28. Not that I paid for it, I was 12 at the time  |
|
|
|
Post by srk on Oct 15, 2012 19:05:06 GMT
I paid about $100 (65 pounds or so) to see them in 2005, and our seats were about 10 feet away from where the moving stage thing stopped in the middle of the field. They played satisfaction right in front of me. I was...(groans)....satisfied.
|
|
|
|
Post by srk on Oct 16, 2012 12:50:59 GMT
Sounds like the mix on the itunes single and the youtube track are different. The itunes one is missing the intro and the thudding drums. FFS.
|
|
|
|
Post by coleman on Oct 17, 2012 8:48:46 GMT
£31 booking fee?  No way would I pay that sort of money, I wouldnt even pay the £106 or whatever it is if it was at the front. Hopinh they do Glastonbury but it does make you wonder if they will with the sort of money they want for playing. Eavis won't make them a special case, he'll only offer them the top scale of what he pays for the artists he wants most and it'll be nowhere near what they would get elsewhere. It is true they would make up loads of money from the exposure on BBC but from what you read Jagger isnt interested in potential earnings afterwards, they want their big pay day in one lump. They might make a special case for Glastonbury as a one off since it'll be one of their last ever gigs and their first time there but im not sure. They could get a couple of millions pound from another festival and still get the tv exposure if they want it, although not as much. |
|
|
|
Post by Benoît Assou-Ekotto on Oct 17, 2012 8:52:12 GMT
It would be funny if they rolled up at V next year |
|
|
|
Post by coleman on Oct 17, 2012 9:01:09 GMT
Well realistically there is only a few they can do and I can't see them doing IOW again since they played there a few years back. Think Reading is out of the questions with the type of crowd you get there, and I can't see the pissed up Scots wanting them at TITP either from what i've seen/read/experienced there, loads of their crowd seem happy with The Killers, KOL etc on a loop every few years. Financially V would probably be their biggest pay day but fucking hell it would be horrific if they played there
|
|
No way would I pay that sort of money, I wouldnt even pay the £106 or whatever it is if it was at the front. Hopinh they do Glastonbury but it does make you wonder if they will with the sort of money they want for playing. Eavis won't make them a special case, he'll only offer them the top scale of what he pays for the artists he wants most and it'll be nowhere near what they would get elsewhere. It is true they would make up loads of money from the exposure on BBC but from what you read Jagger isnt interested in potential earnings afterwards, they want their big pay day in one lump. They might make a special case for Glastonbury as a one off since it'll be one of their last ever gigs and their first time there but im not sure. They could get a couple of millions pound from another festival and still get the tv exposure if they want it, although not as much.