|
Aerosmith
Posted On: Jun 18, 2012 14:16:33 GMT
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2012 14:16:33 GMT
im undecided on aerosmith, i cant really get the atrocites of their power ballad era seperated from anything else. handful of great great songs, but nothing to say theyre an all time great band. Dream On, (aerosmith, not Noel) is proabably however one of my least favourite songs ever, i just cannot fucking stand it. absolutely hate it. dont even mine eminem's sing for the moment, just fucking hate dream on so much. Aerosmith - Get your wings - Toys in the attic - Rocks. 4 albums that indicate their greatness. I've never once listened to dream on with eminem in mind. Terrible way to judge a band. Terrible. Those 4 albums are rock n roll gold.
|
|
|
Aerosmith
Posted On: Jun 18, 2012 18:05:09 GMT
Post by danscouse on Jun 18, 2012 18:05:09 GMT
So these had a credible cheese-less career before dude looks like a lady/love in an elevator/crazy etc?!!!!
|
|
|
Aerosmith
Posted On: Jun 18, 2012 21:32:43 GMT
Post by Simone on Jun 18, 2012 21:32:43 GMT
I guess the issue here is that so many people have this image of Aerosmith as a MTV band who did mainly power ballads for the movies, while actually Aerosmith's early records are a phenomenal blend of Rolling Stones and Led Zeppelin guitar oriented music.
There's a shitload of awesome music from that era that people still refuse to listen to because it doesn't sound serious or sounds like something only someone like a "non sophisticated music listener" would like, like AC/DC, Van Halen, Cheap Trick etc
Another example would be 70s songwriters like Joni Mitchell and Paul Simon. People have never listened to them with much care (or never listened at all) and still come up to you and say they are average artists, nothing more. The point is that their persona hasn't "clicked" with this kind of audience yet. On the other hand, people like Bob Dylan, Johnny Cash and many others more or less unknown fit better in modern days standards. I don't think the two above have produced less incredible music than the two below, it all boils down to listening with your own ears.
Same thing happens to me when I tell people Green Day have made some of the best punk music the US have ever produced -- they think I'm joking.
|
|
|
Aerosmith
Posted On: Jun 18, 2012 21:50:46 GMT
Post by bakester on Jun 18, 2012 21:50:46 GMT
mahoney, make sure you get Pump listened to. My first cassette ever. It is awesome.
|
|
|
Aerosmith
Posted On: Jun 19, 2012 8:26:27 GMT
Post by caspergomez on Jun 19, 2012 8:26:27 GMT
This is the second time you've done his thread Axl For what it's worth The Stones in the 70 >>>>> Aerosmith, in fact almost any band ever Why mention the stones? The stones are the best band of all time, but American they ain't. Cos I'm an idiot who didn't read your post properly Carry on
|
|
|
Aerosmith
Posted On: Jun 19, 2012 11:47:40 GMT
Post by eddiemurphy on Jun 19, 2012 11:47:40 GMT
I guess the issue here is that so many people have this image of Aerosmith as a MTV band who did mainly power ballads for the movies, while actually Aerosmith's early records are a phenomenal blend of Rolling Stones and Led Zeppelin guitar oriented music. There's a shitload of awesome music from that era that people still refuse to listen to because it doesn't sound serious or sounds like something only someone like a "non sophisticated music listener" would like, like AC/DC, Van Halen, Cheap Trick etc Another example would be 70s songwriters like Joni Mitchell and Paul Simon. People have never listened to them with much care (or never listened at all) and still come up to you and say they are average artists, nothing more. The point is that their persona hasn't "clicked" with this kind of audience yet. On the other hand, people like Bob Dylan, Johnny Cash and many others more or less unknown fit better in modern days standards. I don't think the two above have produced less incredible music than the two below, it all boils down to listening with your own ears. Same thing happens to me when I tell people Green Day have made some of the best punk music the US have ever produced -- they think I'm joking. surprised this post hasn't been mauled yet. the soapy standards are slippy.
|
|
|
Aerosmith
Posted On: Jun 19, 2012 12:22:10 GMT
Post by barny on Jun 19, 2012 12:22:10 GMT
So true
|
|
|
Aerosmith
Posted On: Jun 19, 2012 14:28:27 GMT
Post by calimocho on Jun 19, 2012 14:28:27 GMT
Joni Mitchell and Paul Simon, are you on your period shenadoah?
|
|
|
Aerosmith
Posted On: Jun 19, 2012 14:42:20 GMT
Post by eddiemurphy on Jun 19, 2012 14:42:20 GMT
Joni Mitchell and Paul Simon, are you on your period shenadoah? 2 great songwriters tbh. the hissing of summer lawns>>>>>>>>>>punk rock.
|
|
|
Aerosmith
Posted On: Jun 19, 2012 16:14:27 GMT
Post by abs on Jun 19, 2012 16:14:27 GMT
I've got a soft spot for Paul Simon tbh
|
|
|
Aerosmith
Posted On: Jun 19, 2012 16:53:58 GMT
Post by melvin on Jun 19, 2012 16:53:58 GMT
is the soft spot his willy
|
|
|
Aerosmith
Posted On: Jun 19, 2012 16:54:24 GMT
Post by anananana on Jun 19, 2012 16:54:24 GMT
Paul Simon is awesome but is he 'rock 'n' roll'? This thread is confusing.
|
|
|
Aerosmith
Posted On: Jun 19, 2012 22:56:54 GMT
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2012 22:56:54 GMT
is the soft spot his willy one of the greatest tunes of all times.
|
|
|
Aerosmith
Posted On: Jun 20, 2012 15:31:33 GMT
Post by Simone on Jun 20, 2012 15:31:33 GMT
Honestly don't feel the need to ever listen to early aerosmith ever, firstly it's a band that bellends with bad taste like. Secondly I don't really like coked up seventies rock anyway and thirdly there's thousands of other bands I've not heard yet, why would the fact that this one is popular with shit people make me want to hear them first? wasn't Hip Hop/Rap/R'n'B associated with shit music and shit people 15 years ago, while nowdays those artists headline rock festivals? so what happened? Are we having better rap music all of a sudden - which I doubt that because it's pretty much the same old shite, or it's just the perception of people that has changed and now is fine to listen to that? Mind you, I'm not being bitter, just saying that if you refuse to listen to something because it's associated with shit people/shit taste/shit music/shit culture, then you might miss out some great stuff. And isn't there some kind of personal satisfaction in being able to appreciate (or dislike!) something without being tied to social or cultural perception?
|
|
|
Aerosmith
Posted On: Jun 20, 2012 15:38:31 GMT
Post by Simone on Jun 20, 2012 15:38:31 GMT
"shite" in a nice way, of course.
|
|
|
Aerosmith
Posted On: Jun 20, 2012 17:10:38 GMT
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2012 17:10:38 GMT
rubbersoulfag getting owned so so hard.
|
|
|
Aerosmith
Posted On: Jun 20, 2012 20:57:50 GMT
Post by barny on Jun 20, 2012 20:57:50 GMT
The addition was not necessary
|
|
|
Aerosmith
Posted On: Jun 24, 2012 0:51:16 GMT
Post by jimmy on Jun 24, 2012 0:51:16 GMT
One of the greatest American bands of all time. In the 70's they were fantastic. Put their 70's work up against anybody apart from The Stones and they'd come out winners. edit: i'm not counting Dylan or Bowie in this. edit: or Springsteen or Neil Young
|
|
|
Aerosmith
Posted On: Jun 24, 2012 10:32:15 GMT
Post by barny on Jun 24, 2012 10:32:15 GMT
All of them American bands.
|
|
|
Aerosmith
Posted On: Jun 24, 2012 11:10:17 GMT
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2012 11:10:17 GMT
One of the greatest American bands of all time. In the 70's they were fantastic. Put their 70's work up against anybody apart from The Stones and they'd come out winners. edit: i'm not counting Dylan or Bowie in this. edit: or Springsteen or Neil Young
|
|